Qwen3.8 Max

New

qwen/qwen3.8-max-20260803

Qwen3.8 Max is a multimodal model from Qwen that accepts text, image, and video inputs and generates text outputs. It has a context length of 1,000,000 tokens, supports tool use and reasoning, and is not open-weight.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs
  • reasoning

At a glance

providerqwen
releasedJul 19, 2026
context1M
input / M$2

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
1M tokens
Max output
131K tokens
Input price
$2 / 1M tokens
Output price
$6 / 1M tokens
Cache read
$0.25 / 1M tokens
Modalities
text, image, video → text
Knowledge cutoff
—
Released
Jul 19, 2026

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

LiveBench Agentic Coding
64.7%2026-06-25
LiveBench Coding
72.9%2026-06-25
LiveBench Data Analysis
78.4%2026-06-25
LiveBench Instruction Following
74.1%2026-06-25
LiveBench Language
79.7%2026-06-25
LiveBench Math
91.3%2026-06-25
LiveBench Reasoning
88.2%2026-06-25
LMArena Creative Writing
1502 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Instruction Following
1489 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Long Query
1506 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Text
1496 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Vision
1305 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena WebDev
1668 Elo2026-08-02

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Roleplay & CharacterEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for a General AssistantEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Logic & Problem SolvingEstablished evidence

    85% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionEstablished evidence

    81% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathEstablished evidence

    75% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningEstablished evidence

    75% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Open-Weight LLM for Self-HostingEstablished evidence

    67% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Image UnderstandingEstablished evidence

    65% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesEstablished evidence

    64% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMEstablished evidence

    64% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Literary TranslationProvisional evidence

    55% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from WMT translation. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Everyday TranslationProvisional evidence

    55% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from WMT translation. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    55% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from WMT translation. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or Design Arena Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Debugging & Code ReviewProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or SWE-bench Verified. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document SummarizationProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Frontend & UIProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or Design Arena UI. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for JSON & Schema OutputProvisional evidence

    39% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or Structured-output eval. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Structured Data ExtractionProvisional evidence

    39% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or Structured-output eval. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for High-Volume ExtractionProvisional evidence

    31% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Route reliability or Structured-output eval. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LongBench v2. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Vision & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    19% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for RAG & Long ContextProvisional evidence

    18% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LMArena Agent. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    15% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Tool & Function CallingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Computer & Browser UseProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

  1. #2Best LLM for Business Writing
  2. #2Best LLM for Marketing Copy
  3. #2Best LLM for Image Understanding
  4. #2Best LLM for JSON & Schema Output
  5. #4Best LLM for Literary Translation
  6. #5Best LLM for Everyday Translation
  7. #6Best LLM for Translation
  8. #7Best LLM for Document Summarization
  9. #8Best LLM for Summarization
  10. #9Best LLM for Autonomous Agents
  11. #11Best LLM for Debugging & Code Review

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.