Recommendation for Local / open
Best Local LLM for Coding
Our top recommendation for Best Local LLM for Coding, based on the public evidence we track, is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711.[1][2] Reach for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #3 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on. DeepSeek: R1 0528 is the next-ranked alternative. Reach for DeepSeek: R1 0528 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #1 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.
About this recommendation
- Updated
- Sep 4, 2026
- Evidence through
- Sep 4, 2026
- Sources
- 2
- Revision
- v63
Decision audit
Why this result
Inspect the inputs and the computed order behind the recommendation.
Models screened
20
live candidates
Evaluation feeds
6
task-weighted
Winner coverage
57%
intended feed weight
Largest provider share
1 of 2
deepseek
Sources evaluated
The task sets these weights before any model is scored.
| Evaluation feed | Weight | Winner result | Field measured |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 32% | #3 | 3/20 |
| LiveBench Coding | 22% | not measured | 7/20 |
| LMArena WebDev | 18% | not measured | 16/20 |
| SWE-rebench | 13% | #8 | 14/20 |
| price weight | 10% | 81/100 | 20/20 |
| OpenRouter usage | 5% | 51/100 | 20/20 |
Provider concentration
Each exact model is scored separately; provider identity is not a ranking input.
- deepseek1 model
- Moonshot AI1 model
Decision table
Every published model is shown in computed order. Practitioner sources are distinct community threads, not the citations repeated in the prose below.
| Rank | Model | Relative score | Coverage | Practitioner evidence | Strongest measured reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI | 52 | 57% | no linked practitioner threads | #3 Aider Polyglot · #8 SWE-rebench |
| 02 | R1 0528deepseek | 45 | 57% | no linked practitioner threads | #1 Aider Polyglot · #24 SWE-rebench |
Relative score combines normalized benchmark quality and signal coverage; independent practitioner evidence and freshness are bounded tie-breakers. It is an ordering score, not an absolute quality percentage. The writing model receives this order and cannot change it.
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 scores 59.1% on the Aider polyglot coding benchmark (#15 of 28), which tests editing real code across many languages.
Best when: Reach for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #3 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.
Tips
- Reach for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #3 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.
DeepSeek: R1 0528 scores 71.4% on the Aider polyglot coding benchmark (#8 of 28), which tests editing real code across many languages.
Best when: Reach for DeepSeek: R1 0528 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #1 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.
Tips
- Reach for DeepSeek: R1 0528 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #1 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.
Frequently asked
- What is the top-ranked model for Best Local LLM for Coding?
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 ranks first in the current evidence-weighted comparison. Reach for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #3 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.[1]
- What is an alternative to MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0711?
- DeepSeek: R1 0528 is the next-ranked option. Reach for DeepSeek: R1 0528 as a default Best Local LLM for Coding model: its #1 Aider polyglot standing tracks editing real code reliably across languages, which is what this workload leans on.[2]
Sources
- 1
“Scores 59.1% on the Aider polyglot coding benchmark (#15 of 28), which tests editing real code across many languages.”
Aider polyglot benchmark · Benchmark · Sep 4, 2026 - 2
“Scores 71.4% on the Aider polyglot coding benchmark (#8 of 28), which tests editing real code across many languages.”
Aider polyglot benchmark · Benchmark · Sep 4, 2026
Rankings synthesized from community evidence and open benchmarks. See methodology. Not driven by vendor marketing.