Qwen3.6 27B

qwen/qwen3.6-27b-20260422

This model processes text, image, and video inputs and generates text outputs. It has a context length of 262,144 tokens and supports tools and reasoning. Pricing is $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens. It is an open-weight model.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs
  • reasoning
  • open-weight

At a glance

providerqwen
releasedApr 22, 2026
context262K
input / M$0.25

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
262K tokens
Max output
66K tokens
Input price
$0.25 / 1M tokens
Output price
$2 / 1M tokens
Cache read
$0.025 / 1M tokens
Modalities
text, image, video → text
Knowledge cutoff
—
Released
Apr 22, 2026

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)‡
34% ± 2.82026-08-29none effort, evaluated 2026-08-29
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)
35.1% ± 2.82026-08-28evaluated 2026-08-28
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)
85.9% ± 2.52026-08-07evaluated 2026-08-07
LiveBench Agentic Coding
39.3%2026-10-18
LiveBench Coding
71.8%2026-10-18
LiveBench Data Analysis
70.4%2026-10-18
LiveBench Instruction Following
53.2%2026-10-18
LiveBench Language
63.3%2026-10-18
LiveBench Math
79.9%2026-10-18
LiveBench Reasoning
70.3%2026-10-18
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)
91.1% ± 4.32026-08-07evaluated 2026-08-07
SWE-rebench (2026-05-15 to 2026-07-01)‡
31.2% ± 1.72026-10-21tools, tasks 2026-05-15 to 2026-07-01

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference. ‡ Submitted scaffold plus model result. Compare the harness and effort settings, not only the model name.

Open-weight model on Hugging Face.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathEstablished evidence

    74% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningEstablished evidence

    72% of intended weighted task evidence across 4 independent sources. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Logic & Problem SolvingEstablished evidence

    64% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Debugging & Code ReviewEstablished evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingEstablished evidence

    41% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsEstablished evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Show all 36 tasks
  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingEstablished evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingEstablished evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsEstablished evidence

    23% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 9 of 9 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence

    43% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LMArena WebDev. 3 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    42% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for a General AssistantProvisional evidence

    41% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) or LMArena Instruction Following. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Open-Weight LLM for Self-HostingProvisional evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Roleplay & CharacterProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Instruction Following. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Literary TranslationProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or WMT translation. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Instruction Following. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Everyday TranslationProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or WMT translation. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or WMT translation. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for JSON & Schema OutputProvisional evidence

    24% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Structured Data ExtractionProvisional evidence

    24% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for High-Volume ExtractionProvisional evidence

    21% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Route reliability or Structured-output eval. 1 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document SummarizationProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 5 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 5 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Image UnderstandingProvisional evidence

    11% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Vision or VLMEvalKit tasks. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Frontend & UIProvisional evidence

    9% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or Design Arena UI. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

Not currently included in a published recommendation. The task evidence panel above says exactly what is confirmed and what is still missing.

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.