GPT-6 Sol

New

openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922

OpenAI's GPT-6 Sol is a multimodal model that accepts file, image, and text inputs and generates text outputs. It supports a 1,050,000 token context window, tool usage, and reasoning capabilities. It is a proprietary model released in September 2026.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs
  • reasoning

At a glance

provideropenai
releasedSep 22, 2026
context1.1M
input / M$2

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
1.1M tokens
Max output
128K tokens
Input price
$2 / 1M tokens
Output price
$10 / 1M tokens
Cache read
$0.20 / 1M tokens
Modalities
file, image, text → text
Knowledge cutoff
—
Released
Sep 22, 2026

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

LiveBench Agentic Coding
52.9%2026-06-25
LiveBench Coding
81.8%2026-06-25
LiveBench Data Analysis
81.2%2026-06-25
LiveBench Instruction Following
68.6%2026-06-25
LiveBench Language
85.3%2026-06-25
LiveBench Math
96.4%2026-06-25
LiveBench Reasoning
88.7%2026-06-25
LMArena WebDev
1686 Elo2026-09-23

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionEstablished evidence

    81% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence

    65% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Instruction Following or LMArena Math. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence

    65% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Instruction Following or LMArena Math. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Logic & Problem SolvingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Instruction Following or LMArena Math. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for a General AssistantProvisional evidence

    55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or Design Arena Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    43% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    42% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    42% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Open-Weight LLM for Self-HostingProvisional evidence

    42% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Literary TranslationProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or WMT translation. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Everyday TranslationProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or WMT translation. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Text or WMT translation. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Debugging & Code ReviewProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or SWE-bench Verified. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Frontend & UIProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or Design Arena UI. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Roleplay & CharacterProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Creative Writing or LMArena Text. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for High-Volume ExtractionProvisional evidence

    31% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Route reliability or Structured-output eval. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document SummarizationProvisional evidence

    30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for JSON & Schema OutputProvisional evidence

    28% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Text. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Structured Data ExtractionProvisional evidence

    28% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Text. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Image UnderstandingProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Vision or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    19% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results. Official release evidence is also tracked provisionally.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LMArena Agent. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results. Official release evidence is also tracked provisionally.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    15% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results. Official release evidence is also tracked provisionally.

  • Best LLM for Tool & Function CallingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Computer & Browser UseProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Vision & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Long Query. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results. Official release evidence is also tracked provisionally.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for RAG & Long ContextProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Official release evidence · provisional

What the launch material actually says

Verbatim claims from the model provider. These help on launch day but do not count as independent confirmation.

  • “On AutomationBench, a test of business workflows across apps, GPT‑6 Sol at xhigh effort outperforms Claude Opus 5 at max effort at just 9% of Opus 5's cost per task.”
    OpenAI · Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna | OpenAI
  • “On DeepSWE v1.1, which tests performance on complex software-engineering tasks in real codebases, GPT‑6 Sol at max effort scores 68.8%, within 1.1 percentage points of Claude Fable 5's highest score in the evaluation—69.9% at xhigh effor…”
    OpenAI · Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna | OpenAI

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

  1. #1Best LLM for High-Volume Extraction
  2. #4Best LLM for Code Completion
  3. #5Best LLM for JSON & Schema Output
  4. #6Best LLM for Structured Data Extraction

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.