Mistral Medium 3.5

mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5-20260430

Mistral Medium 3.5 is a model from MistralAI released on 2026-04-30. It accepts text, image, and file inputs, produces text output, and supports tool use and reasoning, with a context length of 262 144 tokens. The model is priced at 1.5 per million input tokens and 7.5 per million output tokens, and its weights are not open.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs
  • reasoning
  • open-weight

At a glance

providermistralai
releasedApr 29, 2026
context262K
input / M$1.50

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
262K tokens
Max output
210K tokens
Input price
$1.50 / 1M tokens
Output price
$7.50 / 1M tokens
Cache read
Modalities
text, image, file → text
Knowledge cutoff
Released
Apr 29, 2026

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

LMArena Agent
-6.92026-08-12
LMArena Agent
-72026-08-13
LMArena Agent
-6.82026-08-06
LMArena Agent
-6.92026-08-11
LMArena Agent
-5.22026-08-24
LMArena Agent
-5.82026-08-27
LMArena Agent
-6.12026-08-31
LMArena Creative Writing
1368 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Creative Writing
1368 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Creative Writing
1368 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Creative Writing
1368 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Creative Writing
1368 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Creative Writing
1369 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Creative Writing
1370 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Creative Writing
1370 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Creative Writing
1370 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Creative Writing
1371 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Long Query
1416 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Long Query
1417 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Long Query
1417 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Math
1436 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Math
1434 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Math
1434 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Math
1434 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Math
1434 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Math
1434 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Math
1432 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Math
1432 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Math
1433 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Math
1433 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Text
1421 Elo2026-07-16
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-10
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Text
1427 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Vision
1222 Elo2026-07-12
LMArena Vision
1199 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Vision
1199 Elo2026-07-26
LMArena Vision
1199 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Vision
1198 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Vision
1198 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Vision
1199 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Vision
1199 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-16
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-20
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-24
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-28
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-08-01
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-07-31
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena WebDev
1267 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena WebDev
1266 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena WebDev
1266 Elo2026-08-10
LMArena WebDev
1265 Elo2026-08-14
LMArena WebDev
1265 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena WebDev
1265 Elo2026-08-30
LMArena WebDev
1265 Elo2026-09-01

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Reasoning or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Frontend & UIProvisional evidence

    30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or Design Arena UI. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    28% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or Design Arena Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    26% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Search. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LongBench v2. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or OSWorld Verified. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 18% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    14% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Route reliability. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

Not currently included in a published recommendation. The task evidence panel above says exactly what is confirmed and what is still missing.

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.