Gemma 4 31B
google/gemma-4-31b-it-20260402
Gemma 4 31B is a Google model that accepts image, text, and video inputs and generates text output, with a context length of 262 144 tokens. It supports tools and reasoning, is released with open weights as of 2026‑04‑02, and charges $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.37 per million output tokens.
- tool use
- structured outputs
- reasoning
- open-weight
At a glance
Specifications
What the API gives you
- Context window
- 262K tokens
- Max output
- 16K tokens
- Input price
- $0.090 / 1M tokens
- Output price
- $0.34 / 1M tokens
- Cache read
- $0.050 / 1M tokens
- Modalities
- image, text, video → text
- Knowledge cutoff
- —
- Released
- Apr 2, 2026
Measured evidence
Public benchmark record
- LMArena Agent
- -13.62026-07-13
- LMArena Agent
- -142026-07-20
- LMArena Agent
- -15.92026-07-27
- LMArena Agent
- -14.52026-07-21
- LMArena Agent
- -16.12026-07-28
- LMArena Agent
- -17.22026-08-03
- LMArena Agent
- -18.42026-08-12
- LMArena Agent
- -17.62026-08-06
- LMArena Agent
- -18.22026-08-11
- LMArena Agent
- -18.92026-08-13
- LMArena Agent
- -20.62026-08-24
- LMArena Agent
- -22.32026-08-31
- LMArena Agent
- -23.72026-09-05
- LMArena Agent
- -21.32026-08-27
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1417 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1417 Elo2026-07-27
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1417 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1417 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1417 Elo2026-08-03
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1416 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1418 Elo2026-08-12
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1417 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1416 Elo2026-09-02
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1416 Elo2026-08-27
- LMArena Creative Writing
- 1416 Elo2026-09-01
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1431 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-07-27
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1431 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1431 Elo2026-08-03
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-08-12
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-09-02
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-08-27
- LMArena Instruction Following
- 1432 Elo2026-09-01
- LMArena Long Query
- 1466 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-07-27
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-08-03
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena Long Query
- 1444 Elo2026-08-12
- LMArena Long Query
- 1444 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena Long Query
- 1444 Elo2026-09-02
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-08-27
- LMArena Long Query
- 1443 Elo2026-09-01
- LMArena Math
- 1465 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena Math
- 1466 Elo2026-07-27
- LMArena Math
- 1466 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena Math
- 1466 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena Math
- 1466 Elo2026-08-03
- LMArena Math
- 1466 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena Math
- 1467 Elo2026-08-12
- LMArena Math
- 1468 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena Math
- 1468 Elo2026-09-01
- LMArena Math
- 1468 Elo2026-08-27
- LMArena Text
- 1442 Elo2026-07-16
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-03
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-07-27
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-10
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-12
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-08-27
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-09-01
- LMArena Text
- 1451 Elo2026-09-02
- LMArena Vision
- 1270 Elo2026-07-12
- LMArena Vision
- 1256 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena Vision
- 1257 Elo2026-07-26
- LMArena Vision
- 1257 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena Vision
- 1257 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena Vision
- 1256 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena Vision
- 1260 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena Vision
- 1261 Elo2026-08-27
- LMArena WebDev
- 1367 Elo2026-07-16
- LMArena WebDev
- 1367 Elo2026-07-21
- LMArena WebDev
- 1367 Elo2026-07-20
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-07-27
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-07-24
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-07-28
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-07-30
- LMArena WebDev
- 1363 Elo2026-08-01
- LMArena WebDev
- 1363 Elo2026-07-31
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-08-06
- LMArena WebDev
- 1363 Elo2026-08-02
- LMArena WebDev
- 1365 Elo2026-08-12
- LMArena WebDev
- 1366 Elo2026-08-10
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-08-14
- LMArena WebDev
- 1363 Elo2026-09-01
- LMArena WebDev
- 1363 Elo2026-09-05
- LMArena WebDev
- 1364 Elo2026-08-21
- LMArena WebDev
- 1362 Elo2026-08-30
- SWE-rebench‡
- 25.1% ± 1.02026-05-15tools
LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference. ‡ Submitted scaffold plus model result. Compare the harness and effort settings, not only the model name.
Open-weight model on Hugging Face.
Task evidence
How broad is the support?
Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.
- Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence
70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence
70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence
70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Roleplay & CharacterProvisional evidence
70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence
60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence
60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Debugging & Code ReviewProvisional evidence
55% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Image UnderstandingProvisional evidence
55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Reasoning or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for a General AssistantProvisional evidence
55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Logic & Problem SolvingProvisional evidence
50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence
50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LongBench v2. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Vision & DocumentsProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or Terminal-Bench 2.1. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or Terminal-Bench 2.1. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or Terminal-Bench 2.1. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence
45% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or Terminal-Bench 2.1. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence
44% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or Design Arena Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence
44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Document SummarizationProvisional evidence
40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence
40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence
40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence
40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence
40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence
37% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best Value LLMProvisional evidence
36% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for RAG & Long ContextProvisional evidence
35% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Search. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best Open-Weight LLM for Self-HostingProvisional evidence
33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence
32% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence
32% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Frontend & UIProvisional evidence
30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or Design Arena UI. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence
29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Literary TranslationProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Everyday TranslationProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Tool & Function CallingProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Search. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Computer & Browser UseProvisional evidence
25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or OSWorld Verified. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for JSON & Schema OutputProvisional evidence
17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Structured Data ExtractionProvisional evidence
17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for High-Volume ExtractionProvisional evidence
13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Route reliability. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
- Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence
10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.
Recommendation coverage
Where this model appears
Not currently included in a published recommendation. The task evidence panel above says exactly what is confirmed and what is still missing.
Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.