Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview-20260219

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is a multimodal model that accepts audio, file, image, text, and video inputs and provides text outputs. It has a context length of 1,048,576 tokens and supports tools and reasoning. The price is $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs
  • reasoning

At a glance

providergoogle
releasedFeb 18, 2026
context1.0M
input / M$2

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
1.0M tokens
Max output
66K tokens
Input price
$2 / 1M tokens
Output price
$12 / 1M tokens
Cache read
$0.20 / 1M tokens
Modalities
audio, file, image, text, video → text
Knowledge cutoff
—
Released
Feb 18, 2026

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

Design Arena Coding
1231 Elo2026-10-21
Design Arena Full-stack Agent
1068 Elo2026-10-14
Design Arena UI
1226 Elo2026-10-21
Design Arena Web-app Agent
1125 Elo2026-10-21
Design Arena Website
1235 Elo2026-10-21
FACTS Grounding
65.7%2026-10-21
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)
59.6% ± 2.92026-06-11evaluated 2026-06-11
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)‡
94.4% ± 1.62026-08-06high effort, evaluated 2026-08-06
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)
94.1% ± 1.72026-02-20evaluated 2026-02-20
LiveBench Agentic Coding
44.1%2026-10-18
LiveBench Coding
76.5%2026-10-18
LiveBench Data Analysis
78.5%2026-10-18
LiveBench Instruction Following
79.1%2026-10-18
LiveBench Language
85.4%2026-10-18
LiveBench Math
91.0%2026-10-18
LiveBench Reasoning
84%2026-10-18
LMArena Agent
-3.72026-10-20
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery
-23.32026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability
-5.52026-10-20
LMArena Agent Task Outcome
-10.72026-10-20
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination
-0.12026-10-20
LMArena Creative Writing
1482 Elo2026-10-20
LMArena Instruction Following
1466 Elo2026-10-20
LMArena Long Query
1482 Elo2026-10-20
LMArena Math
1486 Elo2026-10-20
LMArena Text
1487 Elo2026-10-20
LMArena Text Factuality
1472 Elo2026-10-20
LMArena Vision
1280 Elo2026-10-19
LMArena Vision Diagrams
1308 Elo2026-10-19
LMArena Vision OCR
1294 Elo2026-10-19
LMArena WebDev
1447 Elo2026-10-19
LMArena WebDev Image-to-Web
1481 Elo2026-10-19
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)‡
95.6% ± 3.12026-08-06high effort, evaluated 2026-08-06
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)
95.6% ± 3.12026-02-20evaluated 2026-02-20
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)‡
73.5% ± 1.42026-08-10high effort, evaluated 2026-08-10
tau2-bench (1.0.1)‡
26%2026-05-05high effort, evaluated 2026-05-05

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference. ‡ Submitted scaffold plus model result. Compare the harness and effort settings, not only the model name.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 4 independent sources. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Logic & Problem SolvingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Show all 45 tasks
  • Best LLM for Frontend & UIEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Roleplay & CharacterEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 5 independent sources. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for a General AssistantEstablished evidence

    100% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document SummarizationEstablished evidence

    85% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 5 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationEstablished evidence

    85% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 5 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionEstablished evidence

    79% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Open-Weight LLM for Self-HostingEstablished evidence

    64% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGEstablished evidence

    62% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 5 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Image UnderstandingEstablished evidence

    61% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for RAG & Long ContextEstablished evidence

    61% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Tool & Function CallingEstablished evidence

    58% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 6 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesEstablished evidence

    58% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMEstablished evidence

    58% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingEstablished evidence

    55% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingEstablished evidence

    53% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Literary TranslationEstablished evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Everyday TranslationEstablished evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationEstablished evidence

    50% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingEstablished evidence

    47% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsEstablished evidence

    43% of intended weighted task evidence across 3 independent sources. 9 of 9 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeEstablished evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMEstablished evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsEstablished evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for JSON & Schema OutputEstablished evidence

    35% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Structured Data ExtractionEstablished evidence

    35% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Debugging & Code ReviewEstablished evidence

    33% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    65% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    65% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Vision & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    58% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Structured-output eval or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    47% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LongBench v2. 2 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or SWE-rebench. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for High-Volume ExtractionProvisional evidence

    21% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Route reliability or Structured-output eval. 1 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Computer & Browser UseProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or OSWorld Verified. 3 of 3 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

  1. #3Best LLM for Roleplay & Character
  2. #3Best LLM for Marketing Copy
  3. #3Best LLM for Writing
  4. #3Best LLM for Chat & Roleplay
  5. #3Best LLM for Business Writing
  6. #3Best LLM for Creative Writing
  7. #6Best LLM for Translation
  8. #6Best LLM for Literary Translation
  9. #6Best LLM for Everyday Translation
  10. #7Best LLM for Fast Summaries
  11. #8Best Value LLM

Compare head to head

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.