Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google/gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06‑05, released on 2025‑06‑05, accepts file, image, text, and audio inputs and generates text output. It supports tool usage and reasoning, operates with a context length of 1,048,576 tokens, and is priced at $1.25 per M input tokens and $10 per M output tokens. The model’s weights are not open.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs
  • reasoning

At a glance

providergoogle
releasedJun 5, 2025
context1.0M
input / M$1.25

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
1.0M tokens
Max output
66K tokens
Input price
$1.25 / 1M tokens
Output price
$10 / 1M tokens
Cache read
$0.13 / 1M tokens
Modalities
file, image, text, audio → text
Knowledge cutoff
Jan 31, 2025
Released
Jun 5, 2025

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-17
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-21
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-23
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-27
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-28
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-29
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-30
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-07-31
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-01
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-02
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-05
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-03
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-09
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-04
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-06
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-07
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-14
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-08
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-10
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-11
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-18
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-12
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-19
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-13
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-15
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-20
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-16
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-17
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-21
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-27
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-22
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-23
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-24
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-25
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-26
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-28
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-29
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-30
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-08-31
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-09-01
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-09-02
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-09-03
Aider Polyglot
83.1%2026-09-04
SWE-bench Verified
75.2%2025-06-12

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    41% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Coding or LMArena WebDev. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Debugging & Code ReviewProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Coding or LMArena WebDev. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence

    31% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Coding or LMArena WebDev. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    26% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or LiveBench Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    14% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    14% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for High-Volume ExtractionProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Route reliability. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Literary TranslationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Everyday TranslationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document SummarizationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Tool & Function CallingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Creative Writing. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Logic & Problem SolvingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Creative Writing. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Computer & Browser UseProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Image UnderstandingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Reasoning or LMArena Vision. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Vision & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Roleplay & CharacterProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for a General AssistantProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Open-Weight LLM for Self-HostingProvisional evidence

    8% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Long Query. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for RAG & Long ContextProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for JSON & Schema OutputProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Structured Data ExtractionProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

  1. #8Best LLM for Coding
  2. #10Best LLM for Debugging & Code Review

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.