Command A

cohere/command-a-03-2025

Cohere: Command A is a text-only model from Cohere released on 2024-11-01. It supports a context length of up to 256,000 tokens and is priced at $2.5 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. The model does not support tools, reasoning, and its weights are not open.

  • structured outputs
  • open-weight

At a glance

providercohere
releasedMar 13, 2025
context256K
input / M$2.50

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
256K tokens
Max output
8K tokens
Input price
$2.50 / 1M tokens
Output price
$10 / 1M tokens
Cache read
Modalities
text → text
Knowledge cutoff
Aug 31, 2024
Released
Mar 13, 2025

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

Aider Polyglot
12%2026-07-23
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-07-28
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-07-27
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-07-29
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-07-30
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-07-31
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-01
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-02
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-05
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-03
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-09
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-04
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-06
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-07
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-14
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-08
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-10
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-11
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-18
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-12
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-19
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-13
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-15
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-20
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-16
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-17
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-21
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-27
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-22
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-23
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-24
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-25
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-09-05
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-26
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-28
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-09-06
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-29
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-30
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-08-31
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-09-01
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-09-02
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-09-03
Aider Polyglot
12%2026-09-04
BFCL
57.1%2026-07-28
BFCL
57.1%2026-07-27
BFCL
57.1%2026-07-29
BFCL
57.1%2026-07-31
BFCL
57.1%2026-07-30
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-02
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-01
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-05
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-03
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-09
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-04
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-06
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-07
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-14
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-10
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-08
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-18
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-11
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-15
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-12
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-13
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-19
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-16
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-20
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-27
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-17
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-21
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-22
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-23
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-24
BFCL
57.1%2026-09-05
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-28
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-25
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-26
BFCL
57.1%2026-09-06
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-29
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-30
BFCL
57.1%2026-08-31
BFCL
57.1%2026-09-01
BFCL
57.1%2026-09-02
BFCL
57.1%2026-09-03
BFCL
57.1%2026-09-04
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Creative Writing
1318 Elo2026-09-02
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Creative Writing
1319 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-09-02
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Long Query
1334 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Math
1299 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-10
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-09-02
LMArena Text
1354 Elo2026-08-27

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Open-weight model on Hugging Face.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 65% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or LMArena Search. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    41% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Coding or LMArena WebDev. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    35% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Agentic Coding or LMArena Agent. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 33% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Structured-output eval. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 33% of intended weighted task evidence across 2 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Structured-output eval. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence

    31% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Coding or LMArena WebDev. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 30% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Coding or LMArena WebDev. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LongBench v2. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Coding or LiveBench Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or OSWorld Verified. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 18% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Route reliability. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Reasoning or LMArena Vision. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

Not currently included in a published recommendation. The task evidence panel above says exactly what is confirmed and what is still missing.

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.