Comparing 2 models

Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Qwen3.8 27B places higher on 5 of the 6 tasks where both are ranked. Qwen3.8 27B costs 2.0x less per input token. GLM 5.3 accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Qwen3.8 27B for Open-Weight LLM for Self-Hosting (#1), Value LLM (#1), Cheapest Capable LLM (#1).
  • Choose GLM 5.3 for Local LLM for Coding (#5).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Qwen3.8 27B
Model 2GLM 5.3
Best for
Best Cheap LLM for High Volume (#1)
Best Cheap LLM for High Volume (#3)
Provider
qwen
z-ai
Context
1M
1.0MBest
Input / 1M
$0.040Best
$0.079
Output / 1M
$1.35Best
$1.40
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
—
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
yesBest
yesBest
Released
Aug 14, 2026
Aug 14, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationQwen3.8 27BGLM 5.3Source
LiveBench Agentic Coding61.4%60.9%source · 2026-10-18
LiveBench Coding75.7%79.0%source · 2026-10-18
LiveBench Data Analysis76.6%70.2%source · 2026-10-18
LiveBench Instruction Following72.7%69.3%source · 2026-10-18
LiveBench Language74.3%79.9%source · 2026-10-18
LiveBench Math86.2%87.9%source · 2026-10-18
LiveBench Reasoning80.0%85.8%source · 2026-10-18
LMArena Agent-3.81.4source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Agent Steerability-3.9-0.3source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Agent Task Outcome-1.53.4source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination-0.10.7source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Creative Writing1383 Elo1458 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Instruction Following1436 Elo1479 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Long Query1448 Elo1483 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Math1455 Elo1495 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Text1437 Elo1481 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Text Factuality1437 Elo1467 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena WebDev1593 Elo1621 Elosource · 2026-10-19

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.