Comparing 2 models

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 27B

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.8 27B are not yet ranked on the same task, so compare the specifications below. Qwen3.8 27B costs 50.0x less per input token. Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1.0x more context. Only Qwen3.8 27B has open weights for self-hosting.

  • Choose Qwen3.8 27B for you need to self-host.

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Gemini 4 Argon
Model 2Qwen3.8 27B
Best for
a General Assistant (#1)
Best Cheap LLM for High Volume (#1)
Provider
google
qwen
Context
1.0MBest
1M
Input / 1M
$2
$0.040Best
Output / 1M
$10
$1.35Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
yesBest
Released
Sep 30, 2026
Aug 14, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8 27BSource
LMArena Agent12-3.8source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Agent Steerability14.6-3.9source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Agent Task Outcome13.8-1.5source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.3-0.1source · 2026-10-20
LMArena Creative Writing1527 Elo1383 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Instruction Following1534 Elo1436 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Long Query1547 Elo1448 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Math1536 Elo1455 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Text1524 Elo1437 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena Text Factuality1511 Elo1437 Elosource · 2026-10-20
LMArena WebDev1678 Elo1593 Elosource · 2026-10-19

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.