GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

openai/gpt-4o-2024-05-13

This model accepts text, image, and file inputs and generates text outputs. It has a context length of 128,000 tokens and supports tool use.

  • tool use
  • structured outputs

At a glance

provideropenai
releasedMay 13, 2024
context128K
input / M$5

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
128K tokens
Max output
4K tokens
Input price
$5 / 1M tokens
Output price
$15 / 1M tokens
Cache read
Modalities
text, image, file → text
Knowledge cutoff
Oct 31, 2023
Released
May 13, 2024

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

LMArena Creative Writing
1292 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Creative Writing
1292 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Creative Writing
1292 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Creative Writing
1292 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Creative Writing
1292 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Creative Writing
1292 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Creative Writing
1291 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Creative Writing
1291 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Creative Writing
1291 Elo2026-09-02
LMArena Creative Writing
1291 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Creative Writing
1291 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Long Query
1289 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Long Query
1289 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Long Query
1289 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Long Query
1289 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Long Query
1289 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Long Query
1289 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Long Query
1288 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Long Query
1288 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Long Query
1288 Elo2026-09-02
LMArena Long Query
1288 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Long Query
1288 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Math
1284 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-07-27
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-10
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-03
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-12
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-09-01
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-09-02
LMArena Text
1346 Elo2026-08-27
LMArena Vision
1137 Elo2026-07-12
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-07-21
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-07-26
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-07-30
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-08-02
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-08-06
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-08-21
LMArena Vision
1162 Elo2026-08-27
SWE-bench Verified
68.2%2025-05-16
SWE-bench Verified
38.8%2024-10-28

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 70% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    60% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Reasoning or VLMEvalKit tasks. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 55% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 50% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence

    40% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    36% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 33% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    29% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or Route reliability. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LongBench v2. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    25% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or Structured-output eval. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 18% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 17% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Data Analysis. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    16% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or Design Arena Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Route reliability. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LMArena Agent. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Berkeley Function Calling or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

Not currently included in a published recommendation. The task evidence panel above says exactly what is confirmed and what is still missing.

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.