Command R7B (12-2024)

cohere/command-r7b-12-2024

Cohere: Command R7B (12‑2024) is a text‑only model released by Cohere on 2024‑12‑02. It supports a context length of 128 000 tokens, with pricing of $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens, does not support tools or reasoning, and is released with open weights.

  • structured outputs
  • open-weight

At a glance

providercohere
releasedDec 2, 2024
context128K
input / M$0.037

Specifications

What the API gives you

Context window
128K tokens
Max output
4K tokens
Input price
$0.037 / 1M tokens
Output price
$0.15 / 1M tokens
Cache read
Modalities
text → text
Knowledge cutoff
Aug 31, 2024
Released
Dec 2, 2024

Measured evidence

Public benchmark record

BFCL
32.1%2026-07-28
BFCL
32.1%2026-07-27
BFCL
32.1%2026-07-29
BFCL
32.1%2026-07-30
BFCL
32.1%2026-07-31
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-02
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-01
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-05
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-03
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-09
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-04
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-06
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-07
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-10
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-14
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-08
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-11
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-18
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-15
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-12
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-13
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-19
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-16
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-20
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-27
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-17
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-21
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-22
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-23
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-24
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-28
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-25
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-26
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-29
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-30
BFCL
32.1%2026-08-31
BFCL
32.1%2026-09-01
BFCL
32.1%2026-09-02
BFCL
32.1%2026-09-03
BFCL
32.1%2026-09-04

LMArena data licensed CC-BY-4.0. Aider (Apache-2.0) and SWE-bench (MIT) are open. Design Arena uses blind human preference.

Task evidence

How broad is the support?

Each status is exact to this model version and the selected task. Official release claims remain provisional.

  • 65% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or LMArena Search. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Hermes AgentProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenHandsProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for GooseProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OpenClawProvisional evidence

    44% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or SWE-rebench. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for AI AgentsProvisional evidence

    35% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Agentic Coding or LMArena Agent. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 22% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or LMArena Text. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 22% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or LMArena Text. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 20% of intended weighted task evidence across 1 independent source; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Agent or OSWorld Verified. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Cheap LLM for High VolumeProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Cheapest Capable LLMProvisional evidence

    17% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Fast SummariesProvisional evidence

    14% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Value LLMProvisional evidence

    14% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Data Analysis or Route reliability. 2 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Code CompletionProvisional evidence

    13% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 4 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for TranslationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 4 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 6 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or Design Arena Coding. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Business WritingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Creative Writing. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Marketing CopyProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Creative Writing. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for SummarizationProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LiveBench Instruction Following. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Chat & RoleplayProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Creative WritingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for OCR & DocumentsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Reasoning or LMArena Vision. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for WritingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Grounded RAGProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from CRAG or FACTS Grounding. 2 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Language. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Charts & DiagramsProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Document ParsingProvisional evidence

    10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Vision. 3 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 10% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 8% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Instruction Following or LMArena Text. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Massive ContextProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LMArena Document or LMArena Long Query. 3 of 4 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • 6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from FACTS Grounding or LMArena Document. 4 of 6 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best Local LLM for CodingProvisional evidence

    6% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Aider Polyglot or LiveBench Coding. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Competition MathProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Agentic CodingProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Design Arena Full-stack or Design Arena Web-apps. 8 of 8 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Autonomous AgentsProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from Frontier-Bench or LiveBench Agentic Coding. 7 of 7 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

  • Best LLM for Math & ReasoningProvisional evidence

    5% of intended weighted task evidence across 0 independent sources; broader independent confirmation is still missing from LiveBench Mathematics or LiveBench Reasoning. 5 of 5 configured evaluation feeds currently have results.

Recommendation coverage

Where this model appears

Not currently included in a published recommendation. The task evidence panel above says exactly what is confirmed and what is still missing.

Catalog data via OpenRouter and models.dev. Last checked within the past 6 hours.