Comparing 2 models

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-6.1 Sol split the 14 tasks where both are ranked, 7 each. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 2.7x less per input token. GPT-6.1 Sol accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash for Document Parsing (#2), OCR & Documents (#2), Vision & Documents (#2).
  • Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for Image Understanding (#1), Translation (#2), Literary Translation (#2).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Gemini 3.7 Flash
Model 2GPT-6.1 Sol
Best for
Business Writing (#2)
Image Understanding (#1)
Provider
google
openai
Context
1.0M
1.1MBest
Input / 1M
$0.75Best
$2
Output / 1M
$3.75Best
$10
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Aug 13, 2026
Sep 29, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-6.1 SolSource
Design Arena Coding1311 Elo1346 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena UI1301 Elo1331 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Website1306 Elo1323 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FACTS Grounding75.5%82.4%source · 2026-08-27
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)71.6% ± 2.793.7% ± 1.4source · 2026-08-14
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)94.8% ± 1.395.4% ± 1.4source · 2026-08-14
LiveBench Agentic Coding58.3%54.5%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Coding78.9%80.4%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Data Analysis68.0%82.7%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Instruction Following79.9%74.2%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Language85.5%90.1%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Math93.5%96.8%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Reasoning87.8%92.6%source · 2026-10-16
LMArena Agent-0.414.8source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery-5.44.5source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability-3.214.7source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome-0.815.7source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.40.6source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1489 Elo1430 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1484 Elo1469 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1492 Elo1464 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1510 Elo1470 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1488 Elo1484 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1475 Elo1465 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Vision1297 Elo1294 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision Diagrams1321 Elo1311 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision OCR1311 Elo1295 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena WebDev1590 Elo1760 Elosource · 2026-10-13
LMArena WebDev Image-to-Web1603 Elo1703 Elosource · 2026-10-09
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)97.2% ± 1.9100% ± 0source · 2026-08-14
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)69.2% ± 1.573.9% ± 1.4source · 2026-08-27
Terminal-Bench (4.0)11.2%58.2%source · 2026-10-16

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.

task evidence

How they place when the question changes

Lower ranks are better. “Best” marks the strongest option in this shortlist for that task.