Comparing 2 models

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Benchmarks through

Verdict

GPT-6.1 Sol places higher on 10 of the 17 tasks where both are ranked. GPT-6.1 Sol accepts 1.1x more context.

  • Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for Debugging & Code Review (#1), Code Completion (#1), Coding (#2).
  • Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for OpenClaw (#2), Goose (#2), OpenHands (#2).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Claude Sonnet 5.5
Model 2GPT-6.1 Sol
Best for
Code Completion (#1)
Image Understanding (#1)
Provider
anthropic
openai
Context
1M
1.1MBest
Input / 1M
$2Best
$2Best
Output / 1M
$10Best
$10Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Sep 26, 2026
Sep 29, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 SolSource
Design Arena Coding1366 Elo1346 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena UI1378 Elo1331 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Website1330 Elo1323 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)88.8% ± 1.993.7% ± 1.4source · 2026-09-29
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)95.6% ± 1.495.4% ± 1.4source · 2026-09-29
LiveBench Agentic Coding56.3%54.5%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Coding91.4%80.4%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Data Analysis59.5%82.7%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Instruction Following56.8%74.2%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Language78.0%90.1%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Math96.1%96.8%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%92.6%source · 2026-10-16
LMArena Agent12.514.8source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery154.5source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability12.314.7source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome2015.7source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.50.6source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1467 Elo1430 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1488 Elo1469 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1494 Elo1464 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1499 Elo1470 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1475 Elo1484 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1474 Elo1465 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Vision1266 Elo1294 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision Diagrams1320 Elo1311 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision OCR1280 Elo1295 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena WebDev1774 Elo1760 Elosource · 2026-10-13
LMArena WebDev Image-to-Web1740 Elo1703 Elosource · 2026-10-09
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)100% ± 0100% ± 0source · 2026-09-29
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)46.5% ± 1.673.9% ± 1.4source · 2026-09-29
Terminal-Bench (4.0)61.8%58.2%source · 2026-10-16

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.