Comparing 2 models

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Gemini 4 Argon places higher on 4 of the 6 tasks where both are ranked. Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for Coding (#2), Frontend & UI (#2).
  • Choose Gemini 4 Argon for Tool & Function Calling (#2), Competition Math (#3), Math & Reasoning (#3).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Claude Sonnet 5.5
Model 2Gemini 4 Argon
Best for
Code Completion (#1)
a General Assistant (#1)
Provider
anthropic
google
Context
1M
1.0MBest
Input / 1M
$2Best
$2Best
Output / 1M
$10Best
$10Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Sep 26, 2026
Sep 30, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonSource
Design Arena Coding1366 Elo1335 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena UI1378 Elo1319 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Website1330 Elo1321 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)88.8% ± 1.986% ± 2.1source · 2026-09-29
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)95.6% ± 1.496.4% ± 1.2source · 2026-09-29
LMArena Agent12.513.7source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery15-21.4source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability12.316.8source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome2014.6source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.50source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1467 Elo1527 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1488 Elo1536 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1494 Elo1546 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1499 Elo1536 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1475 Elo1524 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1474 Elo1511 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena WebDev1774 Elo1678 Elosource · 2026-10-13
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)100% ± 0100% ± 0source · 2026-09-29
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)46.5% ± 1.676% ± 1.4source · 2026-09-29

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.