Comparing 2 models

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Gemini 3.8 Flash places higher on 9 of the 12 tasks where both are ranked. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 4.8x less per input token. Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for Computer & Browser Use (#1), Image Understanding (#2), Massive Context (#3).
  • Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash for Charts & Diagrams (#1), Chat & Roleplay (#1), Document Parsing (#1).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Claude Opus 5.5
Model 2Gemini 3.8 Flash
Best for
Agentic Coding (#1)
Business Writing (#1)
Provider
anthropic
google
Context
1M
1.0MBest
Input / 1M
$4
$0.83Best
Output / 1M
$20
$4.13Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Sep 18, 2026
Sep 2, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 FlashSource
Design Arena Coding1392 Elo1306 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena UI1378 Elo1319 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Website1338 Elo1303 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FACTS Grounding68.5%73.1%source · 2026-09-24
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)91.2% ± 1.768.4% ± 2.8source · 2026-09-22
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)90.6% ± 1.995.4% ± 1.4source · 2026-09-22
LiveBench Agentic Coding71.7%54.2%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Coding89.3%72.5%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Data Analysis80.3%54.0%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Instruction Following65.7%81.4%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Language86.3%87.8%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Math97.1%91.6%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Reasoning92.2%89.3%source · 2026-10-16
LMArena Agent17.24source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery13.6-0.7source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability17.92.1source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome19.45.1source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.50.5source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1534 Elo1492 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1536 Elo1491 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1531 Elo1507 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1508 Elo1527 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1508 Elo1496 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1509 Elo1474 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Vision1293 Elo1289 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision Diagrams1324 Elo1333 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision OCR1307 Elo1317 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena WebDev1811 Elo1585 Elosource · 2026-10-13
LMArena WebDev Image-to-Web1749 Elo1593 Elosource · 2026-10-09
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)100% ± 098.9% ± 0.9source · 2026-09-22
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)72.2% ± 1.469.7% ± 1.5source · 2026-09-22
Terminal-Bench (4.0)64.8%19.1%source · 2026-10-16

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.

task evidence

How they place when the question changes

Lower ranks are better. “Best” marks the strongest option in this shortlist for that task.