Comparing 2 models

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Gemini 3.7 Flash places higher on 8 of the 11 tasks where both are ranked. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 5.3x less per input token. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for Image Understanding (#2), Massive Context (#3), Charts & Diagrams (#3).
  • Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash for Chat & Roleplay (#2), Document Parsing (#2), Roleplay & Character (#2).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Claude Opus 5.5
Model 2Gemini 3.7 Flash
Best for
Agentic Coding (#1)
Business Writing (#2)
Provider
anthropic
google
Context
1M
1.0MBest
Input / 1M
$4
$0.75Best
Output / 1M
$20
$3.75Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Sep 18, 2026
Aug 13, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.7 FlashSource
Design Arena Coding1392 Elo1311 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena UI1378 Elo1301 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Website1338 Elo1306 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FACTS Grounding68.5%75.5%source · 2026-09-24
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)91.2% ± 1.771.6% ± 2.7source · 2026-09-22
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI)90.6% ± 1.994.8% ± 1.3source · 2026-09-22
LiveBench Agentic Coding71.7%58.3%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Coding89.3%78.9%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Data Analysis80.3%68.0%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Instruction Following65.7%79.9%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Language86.3%85.5%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Math97.1%93.5%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Reasoning92.2%87.8%source · 2026-10-16
LMArena Agent17.2-0.4source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery13.6-5.4source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability17.9-3.2source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome19.4-0.8source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.50.4source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1534 Elo1489 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1536 Elo1484 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1531 Elo1492 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1508 Elo1510 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1508 Elo1488 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1509 Elo1475 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Vision1293 Elo1297 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision Diagrams1324 Elo1321 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision OCR1307 Elo1311 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena WebDev1811 Elo1590 Elosource · 2026-10-13
LMArena WebDev Image-to-Web1749 Elo1603 Elosource · 2026-10-09
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)100% ± 097.2% ± 1.9source · 2026-09-22
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)72.2% ± 1.469.2% ± 1.5source · 2026-09-22
Terminal-Bench (4.0)64.8%11.2%source · 2026-10-16

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.

task evidence

How they place when the question changes

Lower ranks are better. “Best” marks the strongest option in this shortlist for that task.