Comparing 2 models

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Claude Fable 5.1 places higher on 7 of the 12 tasks where both are ranked. Gemini 4 Argon costs 5.0x less per input token. Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for Massive Context (#1), Competition Math (#1), Tool & Function Calling (#1).
  • Choose Gemini 4 Argon for Logic & Problem Solving (#1), Grounded RAG (#1), Document Summarization (#1).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Claude Fable 5.1
Model 2Gemini 4 Argon
Best for
Competition Math (#1)
a General Assistant (#1)
Provider
anthropic
google
Context
1M
1.0MBest
Input / 1M
$10
$2Best
Output / 1M
$50
$10Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Aug 29, 2026
Sep 30, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 4 ArgonSource
Design Arena Coding1338 Elo1335 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena UI1338 Elo1319 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Website1314 Elo1321 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)90.2% ± 1.886% ± 2.1source · 2026-09-01
LMArena Agent14.113.7source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery11.6-21.4source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability14.716.8source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome15.714.6source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.60source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1508 Elo1527 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1517 Elo1536 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1523 Elo1546 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1528 Elo1536 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1502 Elo1524 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1498 Elo1511 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena WebDev1743 Elo1678 Elosource · 2026-10-13
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)100% ± 0100% ± 0source · 2026-09-01
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)70.8% ± 1.476% ± 1.4source · 2026-09-01

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.