Comparing 2 models

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Benchmarks through

Verdict

Gemini 3.8 Flash places higher on 17 of the 21 tasks where both are ranked. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 12.1x less per input token. Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1.0x more context.

  • Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for Massive Context (#1), Computer & Browser Use (#3), Grounded RAG (#4).
  • Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash for Creative Writing (#1), Translation (#1), Charts & Diagrams (#1).

Built from the published task rankings below; ranks come from each task's own weighted benchmarks, so a win on one task says nothing about another.

metric
Model 1Claude Fable 5.1
Model 2Gemini 3.8 Flash
Best for
Competition Math (#1)
Business Writing (#1)
Provider
anthropic
google
Context
1M
1.0MBest
Input / 1M
$10
$0.83Best
Output / 1M
$50
$4.13Best
Tool use
yesBest
yesBest
Vision
yesBest
yesBest
Reasoning
yesBest
yesBest
Open-weight
—
—
Released
Aug 29, 2026
Sep 2, 2026

Measured head to head

Benchmarks both models were run on

EvaluationClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.8 FlashSource
Design Arena Coding1338 Elo1306 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Full-stack Agent1326 Elo1244 Elosource · 2026-10-14
Design Arena UI1338 Elo1319 Elosource · 2026-10-16
Design Arena Web-app Agent1311 Elo1231 Elosource · 2026-10-14
Design Arena Website1314 Elo1303 Elosource · 2026-10-16
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (Epoch AI)90.2% ± 1.868.4% ± 2.8source · 2026-09-01
LiveBench Agentic Coding66.1%54.2%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Coding86.4%72.5%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Data Analysis80.3%54.0%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Instruction Following73.0%81.4%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Language89.5%87.8%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Math97.0%91.6%source · 2026-10-16
LiveBench Reasoning91.7%89.3%source · 2026-10-16
LMArena Agent14.14source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Bash Recovery11.6-0.7source · 2026-10-08
LMArena Agent Steerability14.72.1source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Task Outcome15.75.1source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Agent Tool Hallucination0.60.5source · 2026-10-14
LMArena Creative Writing1508 Elo1492 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Instruction Following1517 Elo1491 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Long Query1523 Elo1507 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Math1528 Elo1527 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text1502 Elo1496 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Text Factuality1498 Elo1474 Elosource · 2026-10-15
LMArena Vision1286 Elo1289 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision Diagrams1326 Elo1333 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena Vision OCR1302 Elo1317 Elosource · 2026-10-09
LMArena WebDev1743 Elo1585 Elosource · 2026-10-13
LMArena WebDev Image-to-Web1720 Elo1593 Elosource · 2026-10-09
OTIS Mock AIME (Epoch AI)100% ± 098.9% ± 0.9source · 2026-09-01
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)70.8% ± 1.469.7% ± 1.5source · 2026-09-01
Terminal-Bench (4.0)57.9%19.1%source · 2026-10-16

Values are as published by each evaluator, in its own units; rows from different evaluators are not on a common scale.

task evidence

How they place when the question changes

Lower ranks are better. “Best” marks the strongest option in this shortlist for that task.